Husband of POTENTIAL FNM candidate wants to know…WHO IS DA BABY DADDY?

24
4553
 
Who is the Baby Daddy? - File Photo

Nassau, Bahamas — A political hopeful for the Free National Movement government is worried tonight after her husband made threats.

Sources close to the family in the position to know have told BP, the politician wannabe had cheated on her better half and tonight DNA reports confirm it.

It was just several months ago when private detectives hired by the husband, caught his wife walking at a major fundraiser with her accused “boyfriend”.

 In a jealous rage the husband claim the couple’s child was not his, and to prove it he decided to have a DNA test to confirm; that the ‘wifey’ had been cheating on him.

Monday of this week lab technicians confirmed what the husband believed all along. Last night relatives overheard the husband yelling, “The child isn’t mine! And who is he ‘pa’?

BP is asking one question, “Who is the baby daddy?”

On the campaign trail over the weekend a constituent could be heard cussing the potential candidate, “…Trust? Gal your husband don’t even trust you…” [firing expletives]

 Inquiring minds really want to know, Who truely is the baby daddy?

24 COMMENTS

  1. This article is a bit salacious. However, the lady coming out of the SUV does have nice legs, so I’m assuming, if this is not a file photo, that she is a bombshell. Be that as it may, it this story is correct and if the lady has political aspirations, then this allegation would certainly prematurely abort them. This society has a double standard when it comes to infidelity, and guess which party has the easier road. I would hate to be in the husband’s shoes, this is a real blow to his ego and male self-esteem.

  2. BP to stop the impostors; why dont you implement some kind of identification system where in order to post users must sign up. That way lady russel will be that person, Grouper mouth wisdom can be that real person and so on.

    • Charles the system is now moderfied and corrected. They cost us a pretty penny this morning but it is worth it. Now everyone Including us are screened and moderated before posting! NO more diatribe!

      BP

    • Charles our job is done. We have corrected the situation and are now on the move to decency without CARL BETHEL and his band of JACKASSES!

      BP

  3. @ Grouper Mouth Wisdom

    YOU ARE A VICTIM OF “MIXED-UP FACTS”. PAPA TOLD THE TRUTH BUT REMOVED THE TIME LINE, GIVING YOU THE IMPRESSION THAT THE BIDS OF COMPETITORS WAS AFTER THE CHANGES TO THE BID STRUCTURE (IT WENT FROM 49% TO 51% – BEING ACCEPTABLE/ MANAGERIAL CONTROL BEING ACCEPTABLE).

    THESE COMPANIES (MENTIONED BY YOU) DID NOT SUBMIT BIDS. THEY RESPONDED TO THE GOVERNMENT’S INVITATION TO SUBMIT BID, AND IN DOING SO EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE COMPANY (BTC). ONCE THE GOVERNMENT SAID “ALL OR NOTHING” THEY WALKED AWAY.. PERIOD. THE OTHER COMPANIES THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN INTERESTED OFFERED ON THE 49% AND WERE TOLD NO BUT WERE NEVER INVITED BACK TO THE TABLE ONCE THE GOVERNMENT CHANGED ITS OWN MIND – SPEAK TO THOSE ONES – WHY DID THE GOVERNMENT NOT INVITE THEM BACK?

    PAPA THEN GOES TO A RALLY AND STATES FACTS (SOME COMPANIES ONLY WANTED THE CELL BUSINESS) BUT THAT IS NOT THE SAME COMPANY THAT OFFERED FOR ALL WHEN ONLY 49% WAS ON THE TABLE. EVERY LEGALLY TRAINED PERSON READING THIS POSTS KNOWS PRECISELY HOW THIS “GAME” IS PLAYED (YOU PULL THE LETTER FROM THE FILES AND REPRESENT IT AS AN UNACCEPTABLE OFFER EVEN THOUGH THE DISCUSSIONS NEVER WENT BEYOND ENQUIRY BECAUSE NEITHER PARTY REACHED FIRST AGREEMENT STAGE – THEY DIDN’T WANT TO BUY SOMETHING BECAUSE YOU DIDN’T WANT TO SELL UNDER CERTAIN TERMS – BUT THE “PUBLIC” OBSERVES YOU WAVING A “REAL LETTER” AND CANNOT APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT “CONTEXT” IS MISSING FROM THAT LETTER IN THE OVERALL SCHEME OF THINGS).

    YOU ARE BEING “PLAYED” BY SOMEONE WHO HAS KEPT BACK ALL THE PAPER WORK RELATED TO THE ENTIRE TRANSACTION. HE IS USING THE PIECES DESIGNED TO PRODUCE A CERTAIN TREND OF THOUGHTS (WITHIN YOU) BY MISREPRESENTING THE REASON FOR THE WRITING OF SUCH LETTERS (BY ASSIGNING THEM PURPOSES THAT FIT HIS STORY). THIS IS WHY SOMETHING CALLED “TIME LINE” IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT IN LAW. ONE MUST KNOW “WHEN” AND “WHY”. LETTERS WRITTEN WHEN THE COMPANIES WERE ONLY MAKING ENQUIRIES CAN, I REPEAT, CAN BE REPRESENTED TO AN UNSUSPECTING PUBLIC AS LETTERS WRITTEN “IN SUBMISSION OF BIDS”. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW (OR HAS THE “FNM THING” TOTALLY DISABLED YOU – DOESN’T ALLOWE YOU TO REASON YOUR WAY TO ANY POSITION THAT IS UNFAVORABLE TO YOUR PARTY)?

  4. @ IMPOSTER (Lady Russell)

    YOU ARE BENEATH THE INTELLECTUAL THRESHOLD OF THIS DISCUSSION (TOO DUMB) FOR ME TO ENGAGE YOU.

    GET A LIFE!

    • Actually, I agree with Lady Russell’s statement. The information was laid out for all to assess on Saturday night. The wannabe Vodafone backed private equity group didn’t make sense and the Digicel people only wanted the cellular license. How is that wrong?

  5. The BTC giveaway is exactly that: a giveaway.
    The Thomas Finleys of this world are so stupid they cannot even work the numbers. Look at the figures man!!!All they can do is parrot the Foreign National Movement’s propaganda without thought or the power of reasoning. What a pathetic bunch of “uncle Toms”…just like their God Ingraham.

  6. @ Thomas Finley

    Tommy, Tommy, Tommy,

    PRICE
    YOUR “SUBMISSIONS” TO ME MAKES NO SENSE IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT THE “PRICE” IS USED BY YOUR PARTY AS THE REASON FOR ACCEPTING THE BID (IN ORDER OF PRIORITY OF CONSIDERATIONS) “AND THE REASON FOR REJECTING THE BIDS OF ALL OTHERS. WHICH WAY DO YOU WANT TO HAVE IT, THOMAS?

    “PAPA” CLAIMED THAT ALL OTHER BIDDERS WERE LOWER 9AT THE RALLY ON SATURDAY, YOU WAS THERE). HE PROCEEDED TO JUSTIFY ACCEPTING THE C&W BID ON THE PREMISE THAT 210 MILLION DOLLARS IS THE MOST THAT HE COULD GET IN THIS ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT.

    BUSINESS PLAN
    WHAT BUSINESS PLAN. THE SO CALLED BUSINESS PLAN WAS A ONE AND A HALF PAGE “MUMBO JUMBO” THAT NEVER ADDRESSED THE PLANS GOING FORWARD. RYAN PINDER READ IT DURING THE PLP RESPONSE ON JCN CHANNEL 14. IT TOOK HIM 2 MINUTES TO READ THE ENTIRE PLAN 9THAT’S TWO MINUTES WITH INTERRUPTIONS BY THE HOST – MR. JONES, INCLUDED). OR ARE YOU SO IRREDEEMABLY FNM THAT YOU COULDN’T BRING YOURSELF TO WATCH THE PLP RESPONSE? STOP BEING LIKE THAT! IT MAKES YOU STUPID AND CREATES STUPID MOMENTS (LIKE THE ONE YOU ARE HAVING NOW).

    FINANCING
    THE OTHER BIDDERS NEVER GOT TO THE POINT OF FINANCING. YOUR ASSERTION HERE WOULD HAVE MAKE SENSE IF THE OTHER BIDDERS WERE BROUGHT BACK INTOI THE PICTURE TO BUY 51% AND MANAGERIAL CONTROL, BUT THE TOP BIDDER (HAVING OUT BID C&W) WAS UNABLE TO SECURE FINANCING WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME FRAME, THEREBY CAUSING THE GOVERNMENT TO GO TO THE SECOND HIGHEST OFFER (WHICH WOULD HAVE HAD TO BE C&W). COME OUT OF THE TWILIGHT ZONE AND DISCUSS THIS SENSIBLY WITH ME, THOMAS.

    HISTORY

    COME ON THOMAS. C&W HAS SUCH A POOR HISTORY THAT THEY ARE STILL IN A MARKETING CAMPAIGN TO REINVENT THEMSELVES. EVEN PAPA ADMITTED THAT THE NAME C&W IS SO “STAINED” THAT HE ONCE VOWED NEVER TO DO BUSINESS WITH THEM. THOMAS, YOU COULDN’T THINK OF SOMETHING ELSE TO USE AS A “FILLER” ….ARE YOU HAVING WRITERS BLOCK (HA, HA, HA). ASK HANNAH TO HELP YOU.

    YOU ARE DEALING WITH STORM!

    THOMAS, STOP DISAPPOINTING AND RESPOND WITH SOMETHING THAT EXERCISES ME TO REFUTE IT. THERE, I DEALT WITH EVERY POINT YOU RAISED. ALL AND SUNDRY CAN READ THE RESULTS.

    COME ON THOMAS, RESPONDS WITH SOMETHING SENSIBLE.

  7. @rap,u should not b 2 concern about gossip until u c the evidence,that’s what wrong with us as Bahamians, we like to comment on things or be concern with things b4 asking 4 proof.furthermore how many of the candidates or even us as individuals don’t have skeletons in our closets,none ,it is just not out in the open as yet.as for some of the MP’s,it was mentioned that they have sweethearts and outside children and we still voted for them,what difference does this make,is it because she’s a woman and not a man doing it.wrong is wrong,like Jesus has said “let him without sin cast the first stone.”personal lives should have nothing 2 do with being a candidate,but what u do 2 better the area that u represent.I could care less about candidate’s personal lives,once they are not stealing taxpayers money or making bad jugdements that will hurt as in the long run.

    • See this the problem nah, firstly I said IF it is true. Next this is why we have so much corruption how can we not care what is going on in a persons personal affairs when we decide to elect them. Will you allow a person who steals to be your minister of finance?

      So sad the level of apathy in this country.

  8. Mind your own business. If you don’t trust the candidate then dont vote for her but for goodness sake stay out the woman personal business. Bahamians to nosey and love a good scandal as if all their lives are peachy cream. Ugh! There are much more pressing matters to be discussed.

  9. Stormy:

    Has this been confirmed as the facts by the Privitisation Committee? If it is in fact true, who says that the money offered was the compelling reason as to why the bids were rejected, and why the bidders were not asked to reconsider when the offer sheet was changed?

    I submit to you that it was the totality of the offer, and not just the money. It was the business plan, the financing, and the history, and also whether the bidders were telecommunications providers or investors( raiders).

    Tell Bernard Evans to re-wind and come again with a more reasoned, comprehensive argument. They must have lots of Union money to be going to the Court of Appeal. Maybe they gettin’ a cut through the back.

  10. @ Thomas Finley & Hannah

    Since you were impressed by Pintard ( I wasn’t), can you answer these questions and respond to my comments:

    (1) DID HE STAE WHY THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDED WITH CONSIDERATION OF C&W WITHOUT ASKING THE OTHER FORMER BIDDERS TO COME BACK TO THE TABLE. THE GOVERNMENT (AS ADMITTED TO REPEATEDLY BY “PAPA”) WAS UNABLE TO SECURE THE INTEREST OF ANY POTENTIAL BUYER WITH THEIR “CONDITIONS” OF ONLY 49% SHARES OWNERSHIP. THIS NECESSARILY MEANS THAT ALL BIDDERS UNDER THAT “CONDITION” – ONLY 49% CAN BE BOUGHT – SUBMITTED BIDS REFLECTIVE OF SUCH CONSIDERATIONS BY THEMSELVES, WHICH HAPPENED TO BE ON THE LOWER SIDE TO THAT OF C&W BID AT FIRST GLANCE, UNTIL YOU APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT C&W BID WAS NOT FOR 49% BUT FOR 51% AND MANGERIAL CONTROL. OOOPS, ENTIRELY DIFFERENT CONDITIONS!

    QUESTION: WERE THE FIRST BIDDERS INVITED BACK TO RESUBMIT BIDS (CLEARLY THEY WERE INTERESTED IN PURCHASING OTHERWISE THEY WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN AT THE TABLE BEFORE), PARTICULARLY SINCE THEIR “IDEAL CONDITIONS” FOR OWNERSHIP, BEING 51% SHARES OWNERSHIP AND MANAGERIAL CONTROL, WAS NOW ACCEPTABLE TO THE GOVERNMENT?

    I WILL SAVE THE SECOND (2ND) QUESTION UNTIL YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS ONE IS DIGESTED. PLEASE, PLEASE NO PARTY TALK AND RALLY TALKING POINTS. IF YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF FRAMING AN INTELLIGENT RESPONSE OUT OF YOUR OWN MIND, THEN “WALK ON BY”.

    I DON’T HAVE TO DEFEND MY INDEPENDENCE AS A POSTER, A HISTORY OF POSTS AND “BLISTERING CRITICISM” TO ALL WHO DESERVE IT FROM ME (ALL SIDES) SPEAKS VOLUMINOUSLY FOR ME.

  11. I care, I care about the premise of this story! And so should you. If this story is true consider the implications, this person would have LIED to their spouse to whom they have pledged fidelity. How will they keep their word to me a mere constituent. This should worry anybody. If you are corrupt in little you will be corrupt in much!

  12. BP, sounds like your smears and gossip mongering aren’t resonating, just like the PLP’s silly slogans and muck raking. BTW, I saw Mike Pintard on channel 40 last night and his contribution was inspiring, brilliant, and balanced. If his colleagues follow his lead, you and the PLP will have to stew for another 5 years! I doubt many will know what to do with themselves; they will be desperate and inconsolable!

Comments are closed.